being hot without looking like a half naked slut
(Zooey Deschanel)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: dunno
-
-
Copy & paste this:
-
'Razzi Sez:
mynameisjane on Disney, Why U So Lazy?! Geneva The Fashion D… on But they’re both convict… elmo on Ian Somerhalder Will Do That T… Dave on “The Simpsons” Fir… OtakuTom on Minimalist Movie Car Posters … Robert on Real humor… timmy on Katy Perry Is Kind Of Terrifyi… Megalodon on Sounds Like A Blast! Maddoug on You Are Also Smelly yay on “The Simpsons” Fir… 
Cheezburger Company Blog
More I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER?
I Can Has Cheezburger? Home - Lolcats n Funny Pictures
Cyoot Kitteh of teh Day: My Special Snuggle Buddy
I Has A Hotdog - Loldogs n Cute Puppies
No gurls allowed
Just Capshunz - All of the Internet. Captioned
Maybe if I Stay Very Still I'll Be All Right
Animal Videos - Cute and Hilarious Animal Videos
Great Escape
Animal Gifs - Cute and Hilarious Animal Gifs
Nom Distraction
Daily Squee - So cute your brain might explode.
Two-by-Snores
Historic LOLs - Captioned Portraits of Yore
So Why Was It The Best I've Ever Had??
My Food Looks Funny - Funny Food Photos
Counteract That Yoga With Cookies
So Much Pun - Visual Puns and Jokes
SUCK IT, NOT TREBEK!
Totally Looks Like - Stuff That Looks Like Other Stuff
American Idol Kyle Crews Totally Looks Like The Big Green Patrick Reena
Must Have Cute - See. Want. Must Have!
Big Head Harry Potter Characters
If Style Could Kill - OMG Style!
Ring of the Day: I'm Batman
Pundit Kitchen - Lol News and Lol Politics Fun
Must Be Blah History Month
Lovely Listing - Strange Findings in Real Estate Listings
String Theory
Wedinator - Your special day... is hilarious.
Skyrim First Dance
Five Minute Getaway - Beautiful Travel and Vacation Photos
Gaudí-esque complex, Punta del Este, Uruguay
Set Phasers to LOL - Sci Fi and Fantasy LOLs
I Didn't Know
Animal Memes - A Meme-nagerie of Famous Internet Critters
Crazy Girlfriend Praying Mantis: It Was My Doctor. He Says I'm Dying. How Bad Do You Feel Now, Lady?
That is why she is sitting there in her underwear? Yeah, great example.
I concur
I don’t care how much she is wearing, I’d tap that AND her sister.
You would tap a tap cuz you are just desperate.
Ummmmmm, no. She’s pretty damn hot
Yeah she is
I’m a straight female and I’ve dreamed of a threesome with her and her sister.
You think you’re straight, and you’re having those dreams? I have some news for you…
What if, hypothetically, you could only tap one?
Zooey…
What if, realistically, you could tap neither?
Buy a Blow-Up doll that looks like Zooey.
Katy Perry.
*highfives*
I actually did consider her attractive (“hot,” if you will) — for about 2 seconds. I was like: legs, okay, body, okay, face, WHOA.
If this was my daughter, I would have disowned her long ago.
listen, you (&^*&$,
i kindof feel bad for you, (if by bad i mean sickened by you) for two reasons:
1-you would judge your daughter on how sexy she is, and
2-you would disown her if she didn’t look pretty enough for you!!!!!!!!
SICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Win
In that case I pray you never have children with fucked up standards like that.
u must be gay
nice vaules you twisted troll C***
i really hope you never have kids, in fact i hope your genitals fall off and you never have sex again.
Does she look like a slut? No, therefore the caption is appropriate and accurate. At least imo.
She is still sitting around with out any pants on. ><
Those are tights. They don’t count as pants? LOL
Not when they’re sheer.
Umm what?
If tights are pants then bras are shirts. That doesn’t make sense in the slightest, people.
Tights? It’s pantyhose. No, that doens’t count as pants, it’s underwear.
No, it’s tights. Pantyhose is only flesh-colored. Sheerness is of no consequence, when determining the correct terms for hosery.
TIGHTS ARE NOT PANTS. Ever.
Just because tights are not pantyhose does not make them pants …
She looks like a just-barely-less-than-half-naked slut. Not much of an improvement, IMO.
(By the way, even if they were pants, any pants you can see through would definitely qualify as slutty … )
I don’t count that as naked. I count that as fully clothed and fairly modest if sexy.
…Fairly modest?
lolWRONG.
Why not? Girls wear long shirts and leggings (and tights) together all the time.
Nope. Tights can definately be pants. For example, dancers have to wear tights. We can’t wear normal pants, because otherwise we can’t move properly.
However, those tights are sheer, and as such really shouldn’t be classed in the same way as normal tights
Tights=/=underwear
Tights=hosiery
Get your facts straight.
BrE = tights
AmE = pantyhose. You say potato…….
She doesn’t look like half naked slut but she does look like a good old fashioned slightly dressed slut.
Also, for the record, I would think a slut is a state of being not a direct correlation to clothing…
Not looking like a slut = bare ass through tights? Wow, I guess the times they are a changin’.
To me she looks like an actress waiting for producerman to come give her a ‘big role’
Sorry, but tights with no skirt and a man’s shirt? if any other woman wore that, we’d look like we just came out of boss’ office.
I think that with the likes of Paris Hilton flashin’ her vag all over the place and generally being a whore, she has lop-sided the spectrum a bit, which makes this slutty pic seem conservative by Hilton standards.
-
“Well, she’s not blowin’ some guy and I can’t see her cervix. I guess this really is pretty tame.”
hahhahahaha WIN!!!!
That was awesome until I got struck with the mental image of Hilton’s cervix… Now I am damaged.
I second this.
I dont mean to sound rude but when did stockings and a shirt become underwear?
The point of this was, she doesn’t have to be showing excessive amounts of skin to be considered decent looking. Try to think a little more if you’re going to insult someone elses idea. She is clearly not wearing just underwear in this picture.
I also concur
First thing I thought as well. If she’s “hot without looking like a half-naked slut”, where the hell are her pants?
Yeah… I like the message but a better picture could be here.
Yeah, this isn’t a very good example unless it’s meant sarcastically. Then again I willingly woke up at 5:50 am, so anything’s possible this morning. X
yes, but how much flesh is on show? compared to paris, li-lo, beyonce…
This.
True, but I mean like the girl has no pants on
but those girls don’t work in hollywood
Except, she doesn’t look hot, and no one knows who she is, so it doesn’t matter at all.
No one knows who she is? You donn’t know Zooey Deschanel? FAIL
I guess I fail too.
Me also, someone care to enlighten us?
It’s Trillian!
She’s one of only 2 surviving human beings!!! and you dare to ask who is she????
Er, “Zooey Deschanel”? Never heard of her either.
Er, you fail, my friend. It’s Katy Perry, not Zooey Deschanel. Not that I really know what either one of those people has done, other than be on Perez Hilton’s blog *hides in shame*
Except the caption says “Zooey Deschanel”. So um never mind, apparently. CORRECTION FAIL!
(And no, I seriously have no idea who she is)
http://www.top40db.net/images/Artists/K/Katy%20Perry.jpg
Yeah. -Your- picture is Katie Perry. However, -this- picture is Zooey Deschanel.
Fail
http://msnbcmedia1.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/060313/060313_Zooey_Deschanel_4p.widec.jpg
she was on yes man, failure to launch, and a few other iffy movies.
It’s definitely Zooey Deschanel. Katy Perry is like the slutty evil twin.
COMPLETELY AGREE! Katy Perry is the slutty evil twin! keel her!
PRaise Zooey Deschanel! PRAISE OR DIE!
*dies*
just f*** them both at the same time = win!
I know I would.
And her sister too.
WIN.
Yes it is most definitely Zooey Deschanel.
And she’s been in quite a few things I’ve seen, but nothing wildly popular or big budget.
She was in Yes Man, Bridge to Terabithia, Tin Man *a sci fi/fantasy mini series*, The Happening, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy…
those are the ones I can think of off the top of my head.
You forgot Elf and The New Guy
..and failure to launch
She was in BTT? I need to rewatch that.
She was AMAZING in Tin Man. Fave minishow. <3<3<3
Almost Famous.
So if your mother, who nobody knows, wandered around in lingerie it wouldn’t matter?
Correct. Especially in this context, since my mother has nothing to do with hollywood. What was your logic in this comment? It’s rather lacking.
Dude, are you gay? Not that I have a problem with that; I’m just trying to understand how a man could fail to perceive her as attractive.
Oops – comment fail. I meant this as a reply to Rowan’s comment. I must have clicked on the wrong link.
yep, I’m pretty damn gay, but my idea of a hot woman would be Pam Anderson a few years back.
EEWWW!!
Seconded.
She’s not a woman, she’s a few implants short of an Android. Jesus, get some taste! Have you ever seen her without her makeup? Looks like a clay bust that got left in the sun too long… ewwww… it’s men like you that are what’s wrong with the world today/
wait wait wait, pam was soooo hot in her young (not borg/android) years
She is a pretty lady, but I agree that she is just wearing tights…if she went wandering out in a shirt and tights I think we would agree thats sluttish, cus you’d be able to see her undies through the tights.So although not as much flesh and not as obviously slutty like those girls FC mentioned, it is still slutty…only less obvious. My opinion (=
(How many times can one use the word ‘slut’ in one comment??)
If I saw someone walking around in just that shirt and those tights, I’d think one of two things:
1) Where’s the state mental hospital?
2) Who stole her pants?!
Because honestly, it wouldn’t look slutty; it’d look slightly crazy or like a stupid mod girl.
I think what they are getting at in the caption is that she is showing little to no skin
This just sounds like someone’s whining over their own poor body image and/or obsolete over conservative ideals. Get over yourself; skin is in!
And as far as this pic is concerned, just looks like an almost dumpy girl trying to hard to look sexy without the self-esteem to do it right.
Dumpy?
Definatly dumpy…
No waaaaaaaaaaaaai, she’s got a lovely figure. I hate sticks!
I think Red might have been referring to her face.
It’s a bit bleh, in my opinion.
I retract my statement. A Google search reveals that she is rather cute, just not in this picture. It also reveals images of her in lingerie and tops with heavy cleavage, so the picture’s captioner really doesn’t have any leg to stand on.
She has cleavage to show?
She has a nice little set of cupcakes. Her evil twin Katy Perry is the one with the serious bazooms.
Alas, while she doesn’t publicly destory her life with booze and drugs like many other young female stars, Zooey looks like she’s given in to skeletal thinness. I saw her this summer life onstage as half of She & Him, and her skinniness of her arms disgusted me. Please, let’s praise and worship healthy curves!
Self-esteem? Please.
Good heavens, who’s whining over their poor body image NOW? : /
Good heavens? lol! Well, good golly gee willickers, Mom!
People who show off their skin 24/7 are not doing it to exude confidence in their body image – they do it because they feel they have nothing else to offer. They may have a good body image, but their sense of self-worth is very low.
Notice how talented entertainers with good self-esteem don’t dress like total sluts all the time.
So you’re saying…
Someone who likes being naked feel like they have nothing else to offer.
Someone who has nothing else to offer have no sense of self-worth
So… nudists have no sense of self worth?
You quoted him wrong, it’s not people who “like to be naked,” it’s people who “show off their skin 24/7.” While this can technically be said of nudists, they generally prefer being naked because they feel it’s a more natural state of being. It is this philosophy that separates them from exhibitionists, who prefer being naked or scantily clad because they get more attention.
Don’t stretch other people’s words trying to make a point, you just make yourself look stupid.
sure… if you find the pre-pubescent look hot.
Dude, she’s like 28.
he did say ‘pre-pubescent ‘look’, dude.
that’s why japanese pron is so popular, even if chick’s like 28, if she looks like she’s 12.
She’s not wearing any pants! NOT a great example, agreed.
She’s not as obviously showing herself off like the girls FC mentioned, she’s doing it in a more subtle way. Cudos on being subtle, but minus points on just being a *insert appropriate word* for wandering around in tights….
Yeah, I really don’t get what’s up with that! Big hair and animal prints, not to mention leg warmers and TIGHTS WORN AS PANTS? That may have been acceptable 20 years ago, but even so, the 80s were a fashion disaster and tights are still not pants! GET OVER IT
(= Tights as pants = wrong. Nobody wants to see your undies!!
Depending on who we’re talking about, I generally don’t mind seeing undies. Zooey, no problem a’tall. And I’m not even very high on the pervy scale either.
Kudos*
Too bad she IS half naked…
unfortunately not
How is she dumpy? I’m not saying she’s hot… but what is sexy to you people?
Bug eyes = not hot. She’s just not a pretty lady. If she didn’t have kindasorta large boobs, I don’t think people would equate her with “hot” at all.
She *doesn’t* have large boobs. You’re confusing her with Katy Perry. She *is* lyrically beautiful however.
There is seriously no pleasing some people. If they aren’t showing 2/3 of their skin, covered in makeup with fake boobs and everything else…then they’re not hot…..
(sarcasm)
Ah, just saying . . . no pants, and we can see her bum. Fail?
lol uncovered bum fail
Haha. Bum…
But…but…she forgot her underpants….
And she’s not hot….
OH! I get it, it is sarcasm? A sarcasm win? Maybe?
I actually think she’s really pretty. And her voice is absolutely gorgeous, I love that 50′s ish sound she’s got. Watch Elf. Or check out Him and Her or whatever the band is called.
She’s also in lots of movies… Elf, Bridge to Terabithia, The Happening (I think… whatever had John Leguizamo in it), SciFi’s “Oz”…
She’s Bone’s sister, if anyone watches Bones.
i watch Bones
xceot Emily’s waaaay hotter than Zooey
Emily is definitely hotter
oh is she the one that will farell falls in love with? i remember her being a bit slimmer in the film though – if its the same girl im thinking of?
Yes, it’s the same girl. Maybe she’s been photoshopped, or gained some weight. Or maybe this picture is from before and she had lost weight.
Elf, really? Is that like her flagship project?
She was the older sister in Almost Famous. That was her first major role.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0221046/
She is really pretty. And she’s not a slut. I don’t understand how people say that she’s not. She doesn’t have “bug eyes” you can’t even see her butt in this picture, and she’s not really showing off any boob either.
And of course she’s not going to walk around the street in her tights. duh.
And ever though that maybe SHE didn’t pick the shot? Her agent, or the photographer or whatever might have picked out the tights.
Sure she’s cute, but she was absolutely horrid in Tinman. HORRID.
Tinman! That was it. I couldn’t remember.
Glitch was awesome.
You think she was horrid in Tinman?
You clearly haven’t seen her epic failure in M.Night’s ‘The Happening.’ Though to be fair it was a terribly written movie, the best of talent couldn’t have saved that abomination.
I think the IDEA had potential. Not as a horror film, but rarely are his movies MEANT to be scary. People just EXPECT them to be scary, and are then disappointed.
But I agree, the actual final product was less than stellar. Not impressed.
I still like her though. She’s kind of a “cute” pretty.
The fact that there are people that don’t find her attractive means the poster should have found a better picture of her.
Not attractive? Her? Surely you jest. Zooey is one of the cutest actresses out there.
Zooey was also in Almost Famous as William’s older sister, and I agree that she is incredibly hot/sexy/cute
I saw this caption in the vote section and nearly fell off the chair when I seen how many votes it got. Seriously who is voting for stuff now, is there a direct connection to a monkey asylum who are the only ones allowed to vote. Cheezburger network fail!
Let’s judge women again! Yay!
THANK YOU.
“The fact that there are people that don’t find her attractive means the poster should have found a better picture of her.”
Except she doesn’t run around with her crotch being photographed every 30 seconds, like most of the Hollywood skanks, most of whom ARE considered hot? A lot of you sound like refugees from an old wallpaper forum, every girl that wasn’t a blonde bimbo with fake boobs, a spray-on tan or didn’t dress in complete garbage was called ugly.
And what’s with the comments about her being half naked? You’ve never seen lycra pants? Ever been to a gym?
The lady knows how to entice with some mystery, waaaay sexier than letting it all hang out.
From above: ” RS
April 9th, 2009 at 8:33 am
I retract my statement. A Google search reveals that she is rather cute, just not in this picture. It also reveals images of her in lingerie and tops with heavy cleavage, so the picture’s captioner really doesn’t have any leg to stand on.”
If that WERE lycra pants, then nobody would have a problem. But they’re not. They’re stockings/sheer pantyhose/tights. Note SHEER.
The image itself is not under question (I think it’s a bit weird – if you’re trying for sexy, that’s not the way to do it; if you’re not trying for sexy, put some pants on), just the validity of the comment.
They ain’t THAT sheer. And it’s for a PHOTO SHOOT, for Pete’s sake! Of course she doesn’t run around like that all the time; who does? Point is, she’s not naked (very little skin and not even PARTS of parts, that, when shown in public, can get one arrested, can be seen) and can still be alluring. That’s it!
i’d bang her and her sister
Except she’s a lousy effin’ actress. Damn.
You guys don’t know who she is!? she is both a terrible actor and singer O_o and not attractive
And she’s wearing no pants, which is slutty in my view! (Not that’s theres anything wrong with the women wearing no pants stuff, there’s just something wrong when its used as an unfunny caption)
so by that standard every ballet company on earth is full of nothing but sluts?
Leotards. Tutus. Nuff said.
I suppose I am one of the few getting a snide laugh at how many people seem to think that half naked = slut… I can’t blame them but I also find it funny that it is being positioned that this woman in her state of apparel is somehow less slutty because she is wearing tights. Not commenting on her as a person, just the appearance in general.
Tights don’t count for much…
yes, nakedness is not equivalent to sluttiness.
I figured I would make the attempt for that statement. Thanks for backing me there.
OK, substitute “trashiness” for “sluttiness”, cuz in my worldview, half-naked = trashy.
Tights, however, are NOT half-naked. No, no one in their right mind (including Zooey), would run around in public wearing only tights and a shirt that looks like it goes barely to the hip–let alone to the bottom of her buttocks–but I believe this is for a photo shoot, and people–how often are PHOTO SHOOTS just like real life?? She’s not flashing naughty parts, so therefore, not half-naked. Barely discernible skin beneath nearly-opaque fabric is NOT half-naked. Poor, poor arguments.
http://totallylookslike.com/2008/08/01/zooey-deschanel/
Katy Perry has a huge butt in her chin, tho. Zooey doesn’t.
Wow…this picture+ comments= overreaction of the year?
Truth win.
Indeed. I can’t believe how bent out of shape people get whenever someone makes a comment about slutty hollywood girls. It’s either people who think EVERYONE is a slut. People who call anyone not a toothpick “chubby” and accuse everyone else of being jealous whales, or people ranting about how they’re a talentless sellout who isn’t worth the dirt on their shoes, or people who think said person is amazing and sparkly gorgeous and freaks out on everyone else.
Like I said, I like her. I think she’s adorable, I don’t think a studio photoshoot picture of her in opaque tights (she obviously doesn’t walk around like this, that I’ve ever seen… and I think we’d see it) makes her a slut, I think she has a lot more taste and appeal than most of the bleach blonde hollywood starlets who have studio shoots done in bikini’s and underpants with no top at all, but considering I don’t know her… who can say? i also think her voice is amazing, but I prefer older music anyway, so I like that voice style.
Glad to see words with some sense behind them. I might as well tell you what I think of Zooey. I think she is an incredibly good looking actress (and the first thing I look on when it comes to girls is the face) and, from what I’ve heard of her singing, she is a competent singer too. But concerning her looks (which is the most relevant point in this “debate”), I don’t see how anyone can say that she isn’t attractive. I first saw her in the HHGG movie, and I “fell” for her from the start, because of her charm and (I admit it) incredible body/face. Calling her ugly is just…odd to me. But that is crucial for me to point out: It’s odd TO ME! Everyone has their own taste, and, while I won’t understand it, I have to respect it.
I’m not sure what planet you live on, but welcome to Earth. The internets here are generally used for anonymously spouting opinion and stirring things up. From what I recall, that’s how it always has been and probably always will be, so please save your disbelief a it just sounds silly.
-
You see that, what I did just there. I used the internets for anonymously spouting opinion and stirring things up. Are you catching on? I hope you took notes…
I am going to marry her.
i thought i would, too, until ben gibbard beat me to it.
ZOOEY ftw
No, she’s not hot. Look at her face. Gah…
Cute, but not hot.
That being said, I wouldn’t reject her if given the time and day.
Hot?? what are you smoking???
SHE’S STARING INTO MY SOUL.
LMFAO
I love Zooey Deschanel! She’s really cute and sweet. I’m not much of a Nylon magazine fan, but she was on the cover of an issue a couple months back, and she had a photo shoot and an interview. It was a treat to read.
http://www.popsugar.com/2036693
Those pictures were amazing! Gotta thank you for that! She is incredibly cute in some of them!
ROFL!! I just adore the multiple layered irony!!
“Zooey Deschanel will charm the pants off you”
And the fact that it’s “Nylon” magazine – and we’re all arguing about her in her “nylons”.
ROFLCOPTER!!!!!
Irony and wordplay? Not the same thing.
>>>>
>>>
>>
In the U.S., “tights” are not a synonym for “nylons” . . . “nylons” ARE a synonym for “pantyhose”, which are sheer hose. Tights are usually opaque, or nearly so; more dense and sometimes textured.
(Is anyone else starting to realize how silly this is?)
Yes, let us all bow down to the gods of the English language – the US! Surely if it’s that way in their common usage, it must be so everywhere in the entire world.
And yes, it’s very silly. Yet I was merely commenting on the amusement factor of something being similar (I was genuinely amused, not being sarcastic in any way), you’re the one who decided to correct me according to your country’s strict clothing definitions. You are correct, irony was not the right word, but it’s passable, no? And has absolutely NOTHING to do with that woman’s state of dress, so yes, I am surely the petty one. Well, I am now for re-commenting, but hey, nobody ever called me tactful. Lots of other adjectives, but not tactful. Unless your US language has changed that word too?
Oh, good gods! In no way was I trying to say that the “gods of the English language” held court in the U.S.–I was TRYING to point out that I was cognizant of the fact that terms could be misconstrued between residents of different countries, BECAUSE it is not so “everywhere in the entire world”, and trying to define them would help matters. I was defining what I believe her to be wearing, which are tights, which are usually opaque. Obviously, Kittah Noir, no country of which I’m aware has “strict clothing definitions–would be be arguing this if that were so?–not even the vaunted U.S.
Yeah she’s cute… too bad she’s a horrible actress.
Gotta agree.
On the other hand, she still isn’t wearing any pants.
The only skin you can see is her face and arm.
You can see no undergarments.
She’s wearing a normal woman’s shirt.
She’s cute.
She’s not slutty.
She doesn’t show too much cleavage, ever.
Everyone I’ve asked knew who she was.
These are my opinions stated one by one in response to all the comments!
First thing I thought was still “Then why is she only wearing tights and a tee shirt?!”
because it’s a PHOTO SHOOT and- probably- no way in real life would she ever wear that, like, out in public.
if you , sweeda, are married and have a husband, would you walk around in only underwear and your husband’s shirt around the house? That doesn’t mean that you will go get groceries in that. It’s the same concept.
Sometimes I get groceries in a shirt and my wife’s underwear. It’s super
challenging to get out of there before the cops show up.
L O L ! ! !
Guess I shouldn’t have said anything. Man people can get worked up over the dumbest stuff. LOL.
is it just me, or does Zooey remind me of Katy Perry?
where I said “remind me,” I ment to say remind you.. Heh, sorry.
That is how you remind me of who I really am.
Chad Kroger totally told me that n stuff. And yea, she does look like Katy Perry. Does she kiss girls, too?
Oh, I hope so, they’re both pretty
She is my favorite actress ever… and amazingly hot. the caption got it right.
oh yeah, and she does not look like Katy Perry.
Katy Perry looks like her.
She is So pretty. I think I am in love !
Tights aren’t pants. So, yeah, she is pretty much half-naked.
Only half, which is so much better than so many celebrities out there.
lol JC you’re right, Katy Perry looks like her*
Either way they’re both hot.
i would just like to say that this is as much dressed as many people in my classes at the Art Institute. I do not agree with tights/leggins as a substitute for pants, esp if you’re over the age of 5. but she does look cute and its not slutty at all.
kinda looks like katy perry.
GOSH PEOPLE!!!! ALL YOU STUPID RETARDED PEOPLE WHO SAYS SHE’S A SLUT IS SO OUT OF CONTENT!!! IF YOU DIDN’T KNOW, SHE WAS SHOOTING FOR NYLON MAGAZINE, WHICH I, INDEED DO HAVE THAT MAGAZINE, AND IT’S ABOUT FASHION—- LEARN YOUR SOURCE & PHOTOS BEFORE YOU EVER ACCUSE ZOOEY OF BEING A SLUT, BECAUSE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU’RE A SLUT STUPID PEOPLE WHO SAID THAT SHE’S A SLUT!!!
It’s sugestive which is sexy…not slutty.
I haven’t seen a photo of an actress/singer looking hot and still having normal clothes on untill now. Her voice is great too.
hot? yes. NOT looking like a half-naked slut? erm…lol
I wouldn’t say looks like a slut, but come on! It’s a shirt and tights, that’s pretty naked
omg. yes. yes yes. im glad someone noticed. she is sooo hot…. and doesnt have to be a complete slut either.
i c were u r comin from………………but wear is her skirt
um…i GUESS you could say 1/3 naked is better than 1/2…but still.
Caption fail.
wow- there are a ton of uneducated kids and jealous fat girls here. The comment on the photograph is saying she does not look like a slut- which many ‘celebs’ have gone to the lengths of to be ‘like oh my gawd’ “Popular!” Zooey is covered almost from head to toe – and the photo and the outfit is paying homage to the Ann Margaret style. Zooey always wears lovely Pantyhose like Ann Margaret and they are both pretty much cut from the same cloth. (Singing/ Acting/ Fashion icons).
Just because she is pretty and has great Legs, that does not mean that she is not allowed to be intouch with her own sexuality. She is a human on this planet and anyone has that right. If you think that this photo is ‘slutty’- you really need to join the “700 club” and start giving them money for your prayers to be answered in the name of Je-zuss!
Just from this photograph alone, she is Obvious very good looking and in great shape. If you do not like her for some reason, fine- but you can’t call someone out- as ugly just because they are not your favorite. I don’t like jessica alba, but i will admit she is very good looking. Rarely are people ‘ugly’. Though we can see a lot of that in the quick tempered kids here trying to show why their quick opinion is fact and now law. (oh brother).
Zooey DesChanel is already a Fashion icon as well as a great actress and a super singer with great taste in the finer things. (Like sexy silky Pantyhose!) She is the one that is chosen to be on the style magazine covers and interviewed for such talents and choices. The brittany / mtv followers here are ‘common’ and just that- followers.
Lindsay28 you are my new hero. One of the very very very few people that wrote here with an actual functioning brain.
Thank you for your comment. You win Lindsay!
True she is wearing an undergarment and shirt.
But the term everyone is looking for is “provocative”. Which is a far cry from slutty.
She still needs pants.
meh, she’s nice
Love those lovely Legs!
(Ladies, please take note, incase you were wondering; we Gents adore you in alluring, sexy Pantyhose.)
Take note of what? She’s not hot…her and her sister are kind of but-’er-faces. And she’s dressed like she’s perpetually 11 years old.
Being half naked does not make a girl a slut. If you got it, flaunt it, because everyone else would. This chick doesn’t have it, so thank God she has the good sense to cover it up.
She gives me the wood man. She is very hot in the Tin Man movie and here she is extreme beautiful and sexy. I wish I can have her.
dude. back off. where was weight or diet mentioned anywhere in this caption?
Ok lady, get those pantyhose on and down to the shops with you!
She may be random to you, but she’s not to me, and obviously not to the poster. It’s just what you listen to and what you watch.
And everyone, stop stereotyping! God, it’s worse than high school.
Yay, a douchebag with no taste! YAAAAAY.