Lol Celebs and Funny Celebrity Pictures with Captions!

 

« Previous | Next »


Alright, he just took the


doug jones

Alright, he just took the ‘Peek-a-boo’ thing to a WHOLE new level …

(Doug Jones as Pale Man in Pan’s Labyrinth)

Picture by: dunno source Caption by: Gods-Roommate via Advanced Lol Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» See all 49 comments

  1. angie says:

    ok-peek-a-boo-and-sh#t-yourself

  2. MWahatten says:

    That movie is a real trip all together, but I gotta say, the tall man here was one of the best creepy parts of the movie.

    He eats kids!=)

  3. LillyLimabean says:

    LOVE this movie. I had creepy dreams about this guy afterwards though.

  4. Ky says:

    Geriatric nudist Voldemort does party tricks?

    • Andrea m says:

      You win, my friend.

      Anyway, awesome movie with awesomely weird characters and extra special thanks to Del Toro for doing his own subtitles so those of us who are bilingual could watch a movie without being driven up the wall by inaccurate subtitles.

  5. rinanolol says:

    Pan’s Labyrinth! that movie was something else
    and that dude right there scared the hell out of me

  6. KarenM says:

    wow never heard of it. Just checked out a few clips and I would like to see that.

    • wozzle says:

      It’s visually thrilling and very moving, but also very sad.
      I’m not sorry I watched it, but I’ll never view it again.

      • farsidefreak says:

        *SPOILER ALERT!* the worst part of it for me was the father beating up the soldier! that made me nearly throw up!

        • Serpentine says:

          That was the point where it was driven home to me that no, this is NOT a kid’s movie.

          • Vel says:

            Oh heck no, it surely was NOT! Despite the fact that all of the previews and clips seemed to indicate it was, if not a kids movie, at least not a movie that would be inappropriate for mature young teens. It was not presented as a horror movie, but it most definitely was one.

          • TwistedParamour says:

            And the fact that the movie is rated R never crossed your mind that this wasn’t a children’s movie? :P

        • Lili says:

          Yes, I always have to fast-forward over that. Didn’t know about it the first time through and am still rather traumatised >_<

      • m says:

        Same here. Good movie but too depressing to watch again.

      • Vel says:

        Agreed. It was beautifully done — the cinematography, the effects, the writing, the acting, and especially the music, were all amazing. It was also set among some of the most gorgeous scenery on earth. The lead actress was a lovely girl, and the whole movie was infused with a sort of lush, sensual (in the ‘feast for the senses’ way, not ‘sexual’) beauty that was inescapable. It did a fabulous job of manipulating emotions through mood, language, music, etc., the plot was impossible to pull out of, and the little actress deserves a bazillion awards for her performance…. but…. but….

        I will never watch it again, and unlike you, I honestly am sorry I watched it. I started crying halfway through, and pretty much didn’t stop, and was still feeling shaky and sick, like I’d woken up from the world’s worst nightmare, two hours later. I did have nightmares for months, in fact. Because… all of that beauty, that whole rich, glorious, sensory orgy was a backdrop for the most horrible, chilling ugliness in the world, and the contrast just made every act of cruelty, every revolting monstrosity, every revealed ugliness of the human soul that much worse. It was like white roses covered in blood… rainbows made of crushed butterflies, still alive and silently screaming… laughing, bright-eyed toddlers playing with human entrails. It just felt so unutterably _wrong_ to have such horrors clothed in such splendor, so perverse, twisted, unsettling. It was far more disturbing, more horrific, than any slasher film — than any film I’ve ever seen, honestly, and I’m normally a “giggle and make sarcastic comments while the cast is dismembered” kind of girl — because of that. Nor am I the kind of person to object to the presentation of darkness/blood/violence in a sensual or erotic manner; I’m rather fond of that sort of thing, actually, when it’s done well. I think, though, that here it was done far _too_ well. The over-the-top violence was far too believable, the evil too real. It left me with a very real, unshakable feeling of absolute wrongness, in the end, and I only watched through to the end because, by the point I realized what I was watching, I couldn’t look away without knowing how it ended… as I said, it was _very_ well done. The ending itself — well, I won’t say anything to give it away, to anyone who might still wish to watch it, but I will say that I found it almost completely unsatisfactory, and it just added to the entire motif of beauty/innocence/hope being perverted/abused/destroyed, _whichever_ way it could have been interpreted, in my opinion. Overall, it was the most depressing, horrifying movie I have ever watched, while at the same time being an absolute, undeniable, artistic masterpiece.

        I also have no idea how that poor little actress came out of that movie without needing some serious therapy, and am not sure that having/allowing a child act in such a thing shouldn’t be considered child abuse. On the other hand, she performed so amazingly, and from all reports came through with no issues at all, and it’d be plain criminal to not allow such talent to be shown and acknowledged…. so I’m torn on that issue.

        • Jane says:

          I think it is an awesome portrayal of the civil war and its effects on people. *SPOILER!* *SPOILER!* *SPOILER! *In the end she escapes what came next, when Franco’s forces won, and ends up in a much safer and, for want of a better word, ‘nicer’ place.

          I will watch it again, at some point (I have it on DVD), but yeah, I cried my eyes out.

        • zen says:

          *stabs self in ears* STOP TALKING!!!

        • Anon says:

          In other words, it portrayed life.

  7. Skye says:

    this movie scared the sh!t out of me

  8. koosaj says:

    so creepy movie!

  9. ShadowQuest says:

    Doug does the creepy very well – he was also the lead Gentleman in “Hush.”

    And the Silver Surfer in Fantastic Four II: Rise of the Silver Surfer.

  10. Jim Eagle says:

    BALL STATE CHIRP CHIRP

  11. Ilove2learn says:

    That’s quite a trick, Mr. Pale Man. But, can you rub your tummy and pat your head at the same time?

  12. Alexa says:

    PAN’S LABYRINTH!!! That’s amazing! I can’t beleive that’s actually on here! I didn’t think it was popular enough. Wow!

    Anyway, he was VERY creepy in the movie. I think that the part with him in it was the scarriest. That movie was the best I’ve ever seen in my life! Everything was SO well directed and the theme is GREAT! I love seeing the other side of the war, as well as it being turned into a fantasy adventure!

    They also did a REALLY good job while putting thought into this monster. He gives the plot-line a very “mythical legend” edge. The idea of him eating children that feed off of the food in his dining hall was just brilliant!

    As soon as I saw the eyes on his hands, I shouted for my brother to come into the room. Not because I was scared, but because we are both Naruto-fans, and he reminded us both of Deidara. The only thing is that Deidara has MOUTHS on his hands, not eyes.

  13. np says:

    Best movie ever made.

  14. np says:

    Del Toro is a brilliant director. If you haven’t seen this movie yet, do it right now. Also check out The Devil’s Backbone. It will make you shiver from beginning to end and for all eternity every time you think about it.

  15. Meghan says:

    The only thing worse than this caption is the movie itself.

  16. Kaeli says:

    I didn’t care for the movie. The child was far too old to believe in fairy tales (although the director admitted this– he had intended a younger actress, but felt that the girl chosen was the best overall pick).

    I accept the mother’s desperation, and her willingness to accept the rule of the captain– she and Ofelia had to eat, after all. and many women have made similiar bargains in the hope of giving their children a better life.

    The captain’s personal vendetta was ridiculously overdone, in my opinion. The war scenes were vicious, and definitely didn’t need to be as violent as they were. Nor did the captain need to be a sadist.

    Ofelia’s fantasy world was well-done, however. The fact that the faun wasn’t necessarily good, or even necessarily on her side, made it more interesting.

    The part of the story in the pic I found a bit silly– if Ofelia was really into fairy tales to the extent portrayed, she’d never have eaten the grapes.

    The end of the movie left me emotionally drained and depressed.

    This movie will stay with me for a very long time, but I hated it, and I wish I hadn’t seen it.

    • Anon says:

      “The war scenes were vicious, and definitely didn’t need to be as violent as they were. Nor did the captain need to be a sadist.”

      So…war is all butterflies and roses then? What a relief!

  17. PANDAmonium :) says:

    omg lol! i dunno why pans labyrinth was so scary lol :) it was though :) v. depressing though :( im almost glad there were subs to read, i didnt have to watch some of the movie :P

  18. Trickster says:

    The caption is not very funny but the film is outstanding.

  19. KatieM says:

    DOUG JONES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i loves him!

  20. Qdude says:

    i own this movie and this part was the only part that was even good or maybe i think that because are movie in in german i think

  21. Qdude says:

    oops sorry i ment to put ” is in german” not ” in in german”

  22. Jordan says:

    actually it’s in spanish. I don’t really understand it myself. It’s about Germans though.

  23. Cydonia says:

    I wish i could unsee this film. That monster haunts my nightmares to this day! And it was so bloody… *SPOILERRR*** when tht guy got beaten to death… i mean the visual aspect was amazing but the film was one of the creepiest things iv seen… and im not a little kid!!! That was most definately not a film for children absolutely not

  24. Kaeli says:

    *SPOILERS BELOW*

    What I liked best about the movie was that Ofelia’s fantasy world was such a fragile thing. Was the mandrake really magical? Were the fairies anything more than bugs?

    Throughout the entire movie, Ofelia’s fragile fantasy is held up with the equally fragile fantasy of the rebels, and indeed, that of the captain. The beauty of the background played against all three fantasies, which was excellent.

    Del Toro explained Ofelia’s eating the grape as extreme hunger– she’d been sent to bed without supper the night of the dinner party, and hadn’t eaten since, due to her mom’s illness. I still think that Ofelia wouldn’t have eaten the grape. As a previous poster stated, a child who’s so into fairy tales would have known not to, no matter what.

    I don’t think the captain was over-done. Other evil, sadistic men have come to even greater power due to their sadism. Hilter, anyone? Stalin? I think that a man like him, had he won the fight for the mill, would have gradually gained power and ended up leading the army.

    The evil of the captain held up to the innocence of Ofelia was also extremely well-done. I found it interesting that he objected to the mandrake root. That section made me think of the witch-burnings, and the church trying to stamp out “evil” and failing to see the evil within itself.

    Of course, the captain knew he’d lost at the end, and at that point, he was willing to let Ofelia go. She refused to leave without the baby, and that is why he killed her.

    Mercedes’ character was my favorite, though. She did very well, skirting both sides. I liked especially how she became a mother-figure to Ofelia, at the same time Ofelia was physically caring for her own mother.

    I wonder why the captain didn’t kill Mercedes when he tricked her into revealing she was helping the rebels. I think it must be because he needed her for the baby, but I wonder if he didn’t admire her courage, just the tiniest bit. I loved that she refused his last request, that the baby would never even know his name.

    The end was so beyond well-done. Did Ofelia really enter into the kingdom? Or was it just the last fantasy of a dying child? I love that the movie left it open to interpretation. I want to say, “oh look! she’s in her father’s house, and now she’ll be happy and safe” but is there such a thing as happy and safe? Even now, we could be wiped out in many different sorts of disasters. There are no guarantees, not even here and now.

    I’ve watched the movie several times. I don’t know if I like it or not– it’s a horrible, horrible movie that’s extremely well-done. A friend bought it for me, because it was listed as a fantasy along the lines of the Lord of the Rings. I was totally unprepared for what I saw.

  25. Kaeli says:

    LOL! I just scrolled up, and made an earlier post on this movie. My current post just contradicted most of what I said in the earlier one. See what this movie does to me?

  26. Psycho Kitty says:

    MY POOR EYES! O_O

  27. Psycho Kitty says:

    MY POOR EYES! O_O not cool.

  28. izzisabear says:

    i was about 7-8 when i first saw this. i wasnt scared at all, yet im afraid of playing sports.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up