
KRISTEN STEWART
The human equivalent of a blank piece of paper.
(Kristen Stewart)
Picture by: dunno source Caption by: Nicolletta via Poster Builder
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Hash Brownies? Yes. Hash Jell-O? No. | Which one’s which? Next »

KRISTEN STEWART
The human equivalent of a blank piece of paper.
(Kristen Stewart)
Picture by: dunno source Caption by: Nicolletta via Poster Builder
Ok, I gotta ask; when did she go Goth?
I’m pretty sure (not certain) that this is for a photo shoot for her newest movie about Joan Jett. I think it’s supposed to be more punk-rocky than goth.
It’s about the band The Runaways, not just Joan Jett.. see the link.
She always looks like that in real life, though people keep saying it’s just for this one movie (though it was done filming a while ago now). As for what kind of paper, I’d say “cigarette” rolling-type is the one she’s most easily associated with.
she looks kinda like a guy now….and it makes her look far more attractive oddly enough, lol
As a guy, I agree. Not the boring “good girl”. But the girl that can be your best friend, and that you can have wild sex with. A great combination. ^^
Introduce me to your friends.
If you’re GAY it does!
Sounds like -somebody- has some sexuality reconcilation to do.
True, but blank paper has potential.
Can’t believe they tagged her to play Joan Jett… disgusting.
I was there back in the day, and now you see it, I can see where they were coming from. Ok, she does look more like a cross between Souixie Souix and Chrissie Hynde, but I’m struggling to see a downside to that.
***Siouxsie Sioux
“Looks like” =/= “can play the part of in a movie about her life”
The question is, who’s playing Michael Steele?
Robert Pattins- oh wait.
Robert Pattinson doesn’t have the time to play Michael right now, he’s too busy killing grunge fans by cracking the voice of a generation.
Ugh Kristen Stewart is the worst actress in the world……why did they have to make her Joan Jett…….Joan was way more awesomener than this freakin bad actress.( sry tht was my opinion
As much as I don’t like the cultural (or lack of it) phenomenon that she’s part of, I don’t know if it’s fair to rag on her like this. I don’t think Daniel Radcliff got nearly as harsh criticism.
Agreed. She was good in Panic Room and In the Land of Women. She’s an actress- she plays roles. They pick her for those roles out of other people, so she must be doing something right… if people don’t like her movies, they shouldn’t go see them, but you’re right, it’s not fair to pick her apart in the way she has been.
she was also quite fantastic in “Adventureland.” really underrated flick with great acting all around.
You must have seen a different movie than I. Thought the movie was good, but all she did was fling her hair and bite her lips.
no, that was “Twilight.”
no that was all the movies she’s ever been in.
Daniel Radcliffe is not a lifeless fleshopoid clearly created from a pile of dead organs by some alchemist.
That would be kinda cool, actually.
And meh, I hate Twilight and her role in it, but I like her, she has this… dark, frosty and down-to-earth manner about her that is a bit rare among other actresses you see these days.
Would you like her better if she acted like a cheerleader on crack?(hmm… I can`t deny it would also be very cool)
You’re a hateful idiot and the caption is not funny regardless of her acting skill.
Are you gay?
Actually Scott, that is EXACTLY why it IS funny.
difference is Daniel’s hot and stars in movies based on good books. so there.
An actor can only do so much with the material that they are given, so, in the case of Twilight, Ms. Stewart was at a severe disadvantage from the beginning. However, that being said, watching Kristen Stewart act = watching paint dry.
is she going for a Rihanna hair style?
If she is, I want to be Chris Brown.
@ Fang
AHAHAHAHA
she owns y’all
I owned your mom.
She played in a series of movies with a really bad script, thus she is bad at acting.
(I will never understand that logic, I guess I could not name one actress that would have played that role better.)
my god, this girl makes Hayden Christensen look deep.
ouch. i felt that one through the wireless. >.<
I thought Keanu Reeves was was the blank paper?
Keanu Reeves is more like driftwood.
I guess he’s a bit creased by now.
Also, of a different gender.
“Also, of a different gender.”
Maybe.
Cuz she’s white and flat?
Saw Joan Jett on the telly recently. She doesn’t look this cadaverous.
When 10 yearolds confuse actors with the roles they play.
<3
A voice of sanity crying in a wilderness of preteens.
This girl has no talent. She severally lacks the ability to show any real, deep emotion and when she tries it’s painful to watch and looks more than forced. The only movie that she’s has stared in that has been a huge success was Twilight and it’s sequels, which only happened because of the already huge fan following before the movies. It wasn’t because she (or any other Twilight actor for that matter) was good, it was because little tweenagers were already in love with it and went weak at the knees when they heard about a movie. Because of such success directors and producers want her because of the press their movies will get because she is in the cast.
As for someone that mentioned Daniel Radcliff, not only did he star in a movie based on a book with actual depth and storyline, but he has a little bit of talent to back it up and has matured and grown as an actor since his first movie, Kristen Stewart has not. She was blank and monotonous in the first movie I saw her in (Speak) to her latest Twilight POS.
That’s not to say she is the ONLY actor in Hollywood with no talent but a career anyways, but they weren’t being discussed here.
you’re just mad because you’re ugly (or maybe you’re not; i’m just projecting my assumptions about people that have enough energy to write mean things about famous people). she’s doing something right; we’re all in the intertubes talking about her.
No, I’m not ugly. I just don’t like to post an opinion (negative or positive) about someone or something and not state my reasons for them. I like my opinions to be understood whether others agree with them or not. And yes, we are all talking about her on the internet, however people talk about Paris Hilton on the internet all the time too, but that doesn’t mean she has any talent.
DIdn’t you know; anyone who has the time and energy to post a reasoned argument on ROFLrazzi is automatically ugly?
(Yes, me included.)
Yeah, apparently if you can write a valid argument to support your opinion written with good spelling and grammar, you just aren’t good looking. I think people that automatically assume that just because you have opinionated on something and backed it with reasons, you’re ugly do so simply because they can’t to it themselves and “you’re just ugly” is the only thing they can think of in their shallow minds.
Prejudice much??? Saying some one is ugly because of what they said……Jeez
Sry tht was to this person ” Mee”
Watch the movie Speak. its also a book turned movie. it may change your mind about her a little.. maybe. i thought she did well in that movie. perhaps also cake eaters.
Poor, poor typecast girl.
She looks pretty with the short hair. She also looks kinda like a guy, though.
And the only reason people hate her so much is because she played Bella, and therefore everyone forgets any other movie she has ever been in.
She looks pretty and she looks like a guy? You’re a moron.
Because, there’s no such thing as a pretty guy.
We’re all very impressed, now put your muscles away.
I saw her in Speak and I thought that she was surprisingly good–HOWEVER, it seems like she’s played variations on the same role since then and I think that is what people react the most to. That and the fact that she looks so totally unhappy and put upon whenever you see her promoting her films.
When she shows some actual range and stops playing sullen, introverted, misunderstood teenage girls then I think people will take her more seriously.
I agree with the variation of the same role. I think it suits her mostly because she is a sullen, introverted misunderstood teen herself. I like her anyway lol
“sullen, introverted misunderstood teen”
Well, that makes her unique. /sarcasm
At least she’s hot
“Free from any sign of personality” =/= “hot”
Also, she’s extremely pale and thin and doesn’t show any sign of having much intellect. Girls who don’t get my jokes are not hot.
Extremely pale and thin girls can’t be hot?
Do skeletons turn you on?
Pale & Thin =/= skeleton
Do not feed the troll. Crystallia.
I was retorting to their joke with a joke of my own.
wow, that was one helluva funny joke. Keep retorting.
I’d hit it (and I don’t mean with my car).
*imitating KS*
i like gray……………………………………………………..
I wanted to like her, but she really can’t act. She can’t show any emotion other then blinking and stammering, and anytime she does, it appears forced and fake. She’s rude to a majority of her fan base, and doesn’t appear to want to interact with the people that support her career. She’s only famous because Twilight had a large following before the films. She exists because the fandom wanted her too, and the fandom will exist after she stops being famous.
And, for the record, she is only getting roles now because that’s how hollywood functions. It’s been mentioned before by the other cast members, that the people in the tabloids get the roles over the talented actors, because the people in the tabloids are what sell. A movie is a product, and an actor sells that product. If your star is followed and in every magazine, they will sell the movie better, regardless if they can act or not. So, she’s getting roles, because she’s splashed on every magazine cover with her beard.
I mostly agree, but I think the fandom will die out eventually. Take boy bands for instance. Flash in the pan, couple years and it’ll be over. And then two new tweeny fads will take its place. It’s like cutting the head off of a Hydra.
Sry but this is kinda of true …..
Well to the comment Lena made…
I don’t like her for several reasons:
She can’t act. She’s horrendous. It really is painful to watch. She shows no gratitude whatsoever toward anything at all. She can’t genuinely smile. The only reason she made it to where she is now is because both of her parents are in the industry and had the connections to get her an acting role at an early age. She has absolutely everything, and tons of people would kill to be in her shoes; she can at least pretend she’s happy. I do respect her on one level, though. She’s not fake in the least bit- and I really appreciate that, because you rarely see it these days, especially in Hollywood. But she needs a serious attitude check. You see her at all of these events, and she looks like a spoiled teenager, bored out of her mind. Hell, she acted like that at the Oscars. You can almost HEAR her eyes rolling. Wake up, Kristen- you’ve got it all. Learn to appreciate it. Kthnx.
okay i don’t know too much on acting, i mean i could point out a great actor when i see one but im not too good on constructive critic. and my mom rented the movie when my 21 year old aunt recommended it-so i watched a bit, laughed too much, and had to leave cause i was being annoying; i was laughing because her surprised face looked like her happy face which looked like her dismal face. she’s teenage angst at its worst and she is in fact as you said a blank piece of paper.
Her head is shaped like a turnip.
alot of people think shes arrogant and unthankful. I don’t think she is, personally. she did little indie flicks that got no press for the longest time to twilight which blew up in her face. I don’t know how i’d handel that kind of insta-fame. it’s alot to take in and now there is no way she can have a life, she has to hide in her hotel room. i think there is more to her than meets the eye
You could always buy a dictionary.
Does she have another facial expression? I’m really confused, I don’t think I’ve seen her use another expression at all.
She’s the female opposite to Keanu Reeves.
go Kristen!
Erm… wow…
This is awkward.
(Darn no edit button)
It appears Kristen is hotter than Rob. Sorry Rob.
It’s a shame you can’t draw acting talent…
Why do you people keep hating good actors and actresses!!!???
She’s an amazing actress! And she does great interviews so why would she be a blank sheet of paper!?
You guys keep insulting great professionals while you don’t know ANYTHING about acting or movies! Are you a proffesional in the movie bizz!? NO! So shut up! You don’t know anything!
I for a matter of fact AM a moviecritic for Metro in Holland, so I know what I’m talking about
Either you’re a troll or an idiot?? Or perhaps both, but definitely one or the other.
Or 12. Probably 12. And I’m not a movie critic, but I am a pretty, pretty princess. I said it on the internet, so you know it’s true…..
If u r a critic wouldn’t u be more sophisticated??? not having a fight over some actress?
And she doesn’t only stutter in her acting. Look at other movies she made, like Speak, AMAZING movie!!
If she and Keanu Reeves had a child, it would be a black hole that would suck away all human emotion.
So, basically a Vulcan?
Didn’t the human piece of paper title used to belong to Keeanu Reeves? He must be hella pissed… A fight between those two would be the most boring thing anyone could ever witness.
hahaha yaaaa….
Zachary Quinto was more interesting just portraying a lack of emotion than this girl is naturally. I’m not sure she could smile sincerely if her life depended on it, and the idea that she’ll be playing the role of Joan Jett, a rock legend and true pioneer for female musicians, makes me wanna spew. While the trailer for the Runaways looked like it had serious potential, I may have to skip it on principle.
A blank piece of paper with HOT scribbled all over it
At least a blank piece of paper has potential. I can’t say the same for what’s-her-name.
The difference is, there are a few roles that men get chosen to play that are SUPPOSED to have little emotion.
That is why i don’t hate keanu, sure he might not be able to act but he’s definitely got the whole ‘stoic’ thing down.