Lol Celebs and Funny Celebrity Pictures with Captions!

 

« Previous | Next »


Hopefully it’s flash paper


kristen stewart

KRISTEN STEWART
The human equivalent of a blank piece of paper.

(Kristen Stewart)

Picture by: dunno source Caption by: Nicolletta via Poster Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» See all 100 comments

  1. paws4thot says:

    Ok, I gotta ask; when did she go Goth?

    • kaydee says:

      I’m pretty sure (not certain) that this is for a photo shoot for her newest movie about Joan Jett. I think it’s supposed to be more punk-rocky than goth.

      • A_Lad_Insane says:

        It’s about the band The Runaways, not just Joan Jett.. see the link.

      • jiminy says:

        She always looks like that in real life, though people keep saying it’s just for this one movie (though it was done filming a while ago now). As for what kind of paper, I’d say “cigarette” rolling-type is the one she’s most easily associated with.

  2. millia says:

    she looks kinda like a guy now….and it makes her look far more attractive oddly enough, lol

  3. JW says:

    True, but blank paper has potential.

  4. peepers says:

    Can’t believe they tagged her to play Joan Jett… disgusting.

  5. JD says:

    As much as I don’t like the cultural (or lack of it) phenomenon that she’s part of, I don’t know if it’s fair to rag on her like this. I don’t think Daniel Radcliff got nearly as harsh criticism.

    • kaydee says:

      Agreed. She was good in Panic Room and In the Land of Women. She’s an actress- she plays roles. They pick her for those roles out of other people, so she must be doing something right… if people don’t like her movies, they shouldn’t go see them, but you’re right, it’s not fair to pick her apart in the way she has been.

    • Forge says:

      Daniel Radcliffe is not a lifeless fleshopoid clearly created from a pile of dead organs by some alchemist.

      • Durendal says:

        That would be kinda cool, actually.

        And meh, I hate Twilight and her role in it, but I like her, she has this… dark, frosty and down-to-earth manner about her that is a bit rare among other actresses you see these days.

        Would you like her better if she acted like a cheerleader on crack?(hmm… I can`t deny it would also be very cool)

      • Scott says:

        You’re a hateful idiot and the caption is not funny regardless of her acting skill.

    • Schweinehund says:

      difference is Daniel’s hot and stars in movies based on good books. so there.

    • Madcapfeline says:

      An actor can only do so much with the material that they are given, so, in the case of Twilight, Ms. Stewart was at a severe disadvantage from the beginning. However, that being said, watching Kristen Stewart act = watching paint dry.

  6. BusyBee411 says:

    is she going for a Rihanna hair style?

  7. vale says:

    she owns y’all

  8. Maraxus says:

    She played in a series of movies with a really bad script, thus she is bad at acting.

    (I will never understand that logic, I guess I could not name one actress that would have played that role better.)

  9. cjvs1604 says:

    my god, this girl makes Hayden Christensen look deep.

  10. Relyks says:

    I thought Keanu Reeves was was the blank paper?

  11. LouZha says:

    Cuz she’s white and flat?

  12. Markitteh says:

    Saw Joan Jett on the telly recently. She doesn’t look this cadaverous.

  13. Anderson says:

    When 10 yearolds confuse actors with the roles they play.

  14. Aluka says:

    This girl has no talent. She severally lacks the ability to show any real, deep emotion and when she tries it’s painful to watch and looks more than forced. The only movie that she’s has stared in that has been a huge success was Twilight and it’s sequels, which only happened because of the already huge fan following before the movies. It wasn’t because she (or any other Twilight actor for that matter) was good, it was because little tweenagers were already in love with it and went weak at the knees when they heard about a movie. Because of such success directors and producers want her because of the press their movies will get because she is in the cast.

    As for someone that mentioned Daniel Radcliff, not only did he star in a movie based on a book with actual depth and storyline, but he has a little bit of talent to back it up and has matured and grown as an actor since his first movie, Kristen Stewart has not. She was blank and monotonous in the first movie I saw her in (Speak) to her latest Twilight POS.

    That’s not to say she is the ONLY actor in Hollywood with no talent but a career anyways, but they weren’t being discussed here.

    • mee says:

      you’re just mad because you’re ugly (or maybe you’re not; i’m just projecting my assumptions about people that have enough energy to write mean things about famous people). she’s doing something right; we’re all in the intertubes talking about her.

      • Aluka says:

        No, I’m not ugly. I just don’t like to post an opinion (negative or positive) about someone or something and not state my reasons for them. I like my opinions to be understood whether others agree with them or not. And yes, we are all talking about her on the internet, however people talk about Paris Hilton on the internet all the time too, but that doesn’t mean she has any talent.

        • paws4thot says:

          DIdn’t you know; anyone who has the time and energy to post a reasoned argument on ROFLrazzi is automatically ugly? ;) (Yes, me included.)

          • Aluka says:

            Yeah, apparently if you can write a valid argument to support your opinion written with good spelling and grammar, you just aren’t good looking. I think people that automatically assume that just because you have opinionated on something and backed it with reasons, you’re ugly do so simply because they can’t to it themselves and “you’re just ugly” is the only thing they can think of in their shallow minds.

      • Amy says:

        Prejudice much??? Saying some one is ugly because of what they said……Jeez

  15. K.O says:

    Watch the movie Speak. its also a book turned movie. it may change your mind about her a little.. maybe. i thought she did well in that movie. perhaps also cake eaters.

  16. Annie Crimefighter says:

    Poor, poor typecast girl.

  17. Name Required says:

    She looks pretty with the short hair. She also looks kinda like a guy, though.
    And the only reason people hate her so much is because she played Bella, and therefore everyone forgets any other movie she has ever been in.

  18. Emholl says:

    I saw her in Speak and I thought that she was surprisingly good–HOWEVER, it seems like she’s played variations on the same role since then and I think that is what people react the most to. That and the fact that she looks so totally unhappy and put upon whenever you see her promoting her films.

    When she shows some actual range and stops playing sullen, introverted, misunderstood teenage girls then I think people will take her more seriously.

    • K.O says:

      I agree with the variation of the same role. I think it suits her mostly because she is a sullen, introverted misunderstood teen herself. I like her anyway lol

  19. Savage says:

    At least she’s hot :)

  20. teatime of death says:

    *imitating KS*
    i like gray……………………………………………………..

  21. Lena says:

    I wanted to like her, but she really can’t act. She can’t show any emotion other then blinking and stammering, and anytime she does, it appears forced and fake. She’s rude to a majority of her fan base, and doesn’t appear to want to interact with the people that support her career. She’s only famous because Twilight had a large following before the films. She exists because the fandom wanted her too, and the fandom will exist after she stops being famous.

    And, for the record, she is only getting roles now because that’s how hollywood functions. It’s been mentioned before by the other cast members, that the people in the tabloids get the roles over the talented actors, because the people in the tabloids are what sell. A movie is a product, and an actor sells that product. If your star is followed and in every magazine, they will sell the movie better, regardless if they can act or not. So, she’s getting roles, because she’s splashed on every magazine cover with her beard.

  22. Lauren says:

    I don’t like her for several reasons:

    She can’t act. She’s horrendous. It really is painful to watch. She shows no gratitude whatsoever toward anything at all. She can’t genuinely smile. The only reason she made it to where she is now is because both of her parents are in the industry and had the connections to get her an acting role at an early age. She has absolutely everything, and tons of people would kill to be in her shoes; she can at least pretend she’s happy. I do respect her on one level, though. She’s not fake in the least bit- and I really appreciate that, because you rarely see it these days, especially in Hollywood. But she needs a serious attitude check. You see her at all of these events, and she looks like a spoiled teenager, bored out of her mind. Hell, she acted like that at the Oscars. You can almost HEAR her eyes rolling. Wake up, Kristen- you’ve got it all. Learn to appreciate it. Kthnx.

  23. Schweinehund says:

    okay i don’t know too much on acting, i mean i could point out a great actor when i see one but im not too good on constructive critic. and my mom rented the movie when my 21 year old aunt recommended it-so i watched a bit, laughed too much, and had to leave cause i was being annoying; i was laughing because her surprised face looked like her happy face which looked like her dismal face. she’s teenage angst at its worst and she is in fact as you said a blank piece of paper.

  24. peepers says:

    Her head is shaped like a turnip.

  25. jamma says:

    alot of people think shes arrogant and unthankful. I don’t think she is, personally. she did little indie flicks that got no press for the longest time to twilight which blew up in her face. I don’t know how i’d handel that kind of insta-fame. it’s alot to take in and now there is no way she can have a life, she has to hide in her hotel room. i think there is more to her than meets the eye

  26. Nilla says:

    Does she have another facial expression? I’m really confused, I don’t think I’ve seen her use another expression at all.

  27. Aio says:

    She’s the female opposite to Keanu Reeves.

  28. mysteriousperson says:

    go Kristen! :D

  29. Crystallia says:

    Erm… wow…

    This is awkward.

  30. one_man_queue says:

    It’s a shame you can’t draw acting talent…

  31. Rikki says:

    Why do you people keep hating good actors and actresses!!!???
    She’s an amazing actress! And she does great interviews so why would she be a blank sheet of paper!?
    You guys keep insulting great professionals while you don’t know ANYTHING about acting or movies! Are you a proffesional in the movie bizz!? NO! So shut up! You don’t know anything!
    I for a matter of fact AM a moviecritic for Metro in Holland, so I know what I’m talking about

  32. Rikki says:

    And she doesn’t only stutter in her acting. Look at other movies she made, like Speak, AMAZING movie!!

  33. EJ says:

    If she and Keanu Reeves had a child, it would be a black hole that would suck away all human emotion.

  34. Didn’t the human piece of paper title used to belong to Keeanu Reeves? He must be hella pissed… A fight between those two would be the most boring thing anyone could ever witness.

  35. varejaogirl17 says:

    hahaha yaaaa….

  36. MamaBlaize says:

    Zachary Quinto was more interesting just portraying a lack of emotion than this girl is naturally. I’m not sure she could smile sincerely if her life depended on it, and the idea that she’ll be playing the role of Joan Jett, a rock legend and true pioneer for female musicians, makes me wanna spew. While the trailer for the Runaways looked like it had serious potential, I may have to skip it on principle. :(

  37. jack says:

    A blank piece of paper with HOT scribbled all over it

  38. Doob says:

    At least a blank piece of paper has potential. I can’t say the same for what’s-her-name.

  39. yE says:

    The difference is, there are a few roles that men get chosen to play that are SUPPOSED to have little emotion.

    That is why i don’t hate keanu, sure he might not be able to act but he’s definitely got the whole ‘stoic’ thing down.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up