
DECISIONS
The answer is YES
(Emma Watson)
Picture by: Unknown
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous I Finally Have a Reason to Watch ‘Glee’ | I Have Her Figured as “Lucky Charms, But Only the Marshmallows” Girl Next »

DECISIONS
The answer is YES
(Emma Watson)
Picture by: Unknown
I can only hope that she she has a friend to make it double.
awww yeahhhh
Taking photos of somebody buying underwear, that’s pretty pathetic. Starting to see why some celebrities would crave privacy.
Dude, she’s holding ‘em up to show the inscription.
Also, the photo makes her look even more adorable than usual.
Yeah, it looks like she’s having a lark with the paparazzo.
I agree – some privacy would be good
you dont need privacy
you need less puffs like you
The photo was taken during a public event – Emma was taken to the shops by a stylist and all that was filmed and available on the Internet with Emma’s consent. So no privacy violation here
I came
I saw.
I conquered.
I jizzed in my pants.
co-co-co-comboooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
breaker
I’ll break your combo…
man i would bone her
damn stalker xD! poor emma
From the look on her face, she is about to break into one serious giggle-fest! Also, please note the size of those panties. She would have to gains some serious weight to even think about wearing them. This is a definite joke she is sharing at some poor photographer’s expense! WIN!
They’re not really that big. I’m a small girl (I have about size 8 in American standards), and my panties aren’t much smaller. Most ladies have pretty round hips and ass, so you need a lot of panty to cover that (or not, but these are panties, not a thong).
those panties look about size 6, small as she is, i figure her for a 3 or 4, so they are just a bit outsized…meanwhile, i find that knowing smirk on her face to be more than just a little bit hot
Ish – not really, this is the “shorts’ type of panties, not the classic, small one, so the size is not really that big