Y’know how the trailers for movies always show the most dramatic and romantic parts of the film all clipped together into 30 seconds of amazing action? Well, with her movies, you can’t tell which is what. You could literally have had Nancyboy Pattinson shooting all their scenes with a woman carved from pine wood, and no one would have been able to tell the difference.
Can we please stop this obsession with Emma Watson? I can guarantee that if she was in Twilight and Kristen was in Harry Potter, the roles would be switched.
Um and I can guarantee that you are wrong. Have you seen anything that Kristen Stewart did before Twilight? Because she’s the same person in every single movie. She has no personality off screen either. Being shy is not an excuse for having attitude.
^^^ That. You can see pictures of her at book signings and other public appearances and she has the same non-expression on her face as she does in the movies whether she’s in the throes of passion or about to be eaten by zombie werewolves or whatever the hell are in those movies. In fact at a lot of the appearances she looks like she’s thinking “Jesus Christ I really do not want to be here, how much longer is this going to last until I can get AWAY from these PEOPLE.” No telling what she does when she finally gets to do what she wants to do, probably smoke pot and listen to Justin Bieber, since I seriously doubt she has any taste for culture.
Dude. Beautiful girls have been wearing short hair since the beginning of time and getting away with it. If you’re sincerely implying that Audrey Hepburn with short hair looked like a boy then there is something WRONG with you.
This was amusing But Watson’s confident looks like happy, her hysterical looks mildly amused, her mischievous looks scared, her shocked looks contemplative, her her shy looks happy, her depressed looks confused, her shocked looks annoyed, her frustrated looks melancholy, her hopeful looks smug, and her angry looks terrified…… so that was a bit confusing.
If Emma Watson is a good actress I never saw it in Harry Potter. Maybe she gets a little better as the movies go on though. She has stopped the incessant blinking at least. Almost to a robotic lack of blinking…
Also Hermione and Bella both have basically the same annoying, confused look on their face through all of the movies. (I give you that Kristen seems to have that look all the time outside the movies too, not only when she’s desperately trying to act.)
I tried to post this once with links to show what I mean, but that seems to have disappeared, hopefully it won’t this time.
Okay, Imma just say, this was funny. Kristen almost never cracks much of a smile or shows ANY emotion.
But I think that she is a beautiful and talented actress for the movies she’s starred in so far. Emma Watson, too. They’re both amazing actresses and role models.
I hate when people hate on stars because of what movies they were in. I mean, I hate lots of movies, but I still love the people in them…people, try not to hate so much.
I agree with you on the part about people hating stars for their roles, but not about Kristen Stewart being “beautiful” or “talented.” It’s just my opinion, but she’s not all that pretty. Emma Watson is way prettier.
The love isn’t vanishing, it’s that we can’t find it as easily as we used to.
I get it, but don’t really want to…
She’s bad because she was in Twilight? You guys are just… You know what? Forget it… You don’t even deserve being that good
It’s not that she was in Twilight. It’s her ability to act in general. Have you seen any of the other movies she’s played in? Such as “Panic Room,” “Zathura,” “Catch That Kid,” or even “The Messengers?” Same dry performance in those movies, as well.
Wouldn’t it be something if Kristen and Keanu had kids? At least they’d be quiet on an airplane. Then again, with all that flatness of affect, you could probably just put them in a FedEx envelope and ship them wherever they needed to go.
I wouldn’t blame Catherine Hardwicke for Kristens lack of acting ability. Yes, the director is supposed to bring out the best in the cast, but when your working with stone that’s kinda hard. The woman did direct Interview with the Vampire which was a spledid movie, and I’ve also seen Kristen in other movies and she looks just as much like a stoner that is spaced out as she does in all her other movies!
Has anyone actually seen “The Runaways”? I haven’t (yet, but I’m tempted; read on) but I did see a PR still where Kristen was talking to Joan Jett (the real one) and the resemblance was scary good.
A lot of us aren’t even judging them by the movies they were in, though. I’ve seen some of the other movies Kristen Stewart has been in, and she really isn’t a good actress. She delivers a dry, emotionless performance in most, if not all, of them.
Here are just a few differences between Emma Watson and Kristen Stewart: 1. Emma Watson is gorgeous. But with Kristen Stewart, it looks like some mad scientist was trying to make something ugly, but messed up and made something uglier than they meant. 2. Emma Watson is probably one of the best actresses I have ever seen. Kristen Stewart is most definitely one of the worst. 3. Emma Watson acts in the movie version of one of the best book series ever. Kristen Stewart acts in the worst.
Why do you have to insult Kristen? She’s just shy,,, jeez, since when is that a crime?
it’s not because she’s shy it’s because she can’t act…
i mean, really, there’s 18 pictures of her and they all look the same!
Maybe that’s because they’re all the same picture…
Keanu Reeves shows more emotion than Kristen.
Nah, its just Twilights directer… give her a decent one, like Edger Wright (Scott Pilgrim) and she’s not bad
I think you are mixing up actresses. Kristen Stewart was not in Scott Pilgrim.
Maybe you are thinking of “The Runaways” where Stewart plays Joan Jett.
I knew there had to be a Keanu Reeves joke in here somewhere…
you know.. she’s shy => she’s asking for it => she’s a whore => problem solved
Y’know how the trailers for movies always show the most dramatic and romantic parts of the film all clipped together into 30 seconds of amazing action? Well, with her movies, you can’t tell which is what. You could literally have had Nancyboy Pattinson shooting all their scenes with a woman carved from pine wood, and no one would have been able to tell the difference.
LEAVE. KRISTEN. ALONEEEE *sobs*
Please. Since when is not being able to act synonymous with being shy?
At least one thing’s for sure.
They’re both better than Miley Cyrus.
Shy my ass.
It’s a crime when you’re a huge movie star. She’s a performer! She’s not allowed to be shy! and if she is then she should get out of the business.
she IS horrribill!!!!!
I mean, Emma Watson is no Meryl Streep, but compared to Kristen Stewart…
Can we please stop this obsession with Emma Watson? I can guarantee that if she was in Twilight and Kristen was in Harry Potter, the roles would be switched.
Doubt it. A lot.
REALLY doubt it. A lot.
MASSIVELY a lot. HUGE ENORMOUS GIGANTICALLY a lot.
A FREAKING GINORMOUSLY MUNDO LOTTO…. yeah.
your kidding right?
Seriously doubt it.
Um and I can guarantee that you are wrong. Have you seen anything that Kristen Stewart did before Twilight? Because she’s the same person in every single movie. She has no personality off screen either. Being shy is not an excuse for having attitude.
^^^ That. You can see pictures of her at book signings and other public appearances and she has the same non-expression on her face as she does in the movies whether she’s in the throes of passion or about to be eaten by zombie werewolves or whatever the hell are in those movies. In fact at a lot of the appearances she looks like she’s thinking “Jesus Christ I really do not want to be here, how much longer is this going to last until I can get AWAY from these PEOPLE.” No telling what she does when she finally gets to do what she wants to do, probably smoke pot and listen to Justin Bieber, since I seriously doubt she has any taste for culture.
i actually have to agree, in the books bella is just a moaning whore. She’s playing the part really well, it’s just the character’s s**t.
Emma Watson isn’t as good as everyone makes out.
Emma Watson somehow reminds me of Tina Fey in a couple of those pictures…
damn haters. it’s so stupid to be mean to people. Mean people are either jealous or have low self-esteem.
Or they are super cool rock stars who are so awesome they can’t help but put down peasants..
Verily.
Yobi, you win a free internet.
yeah.. I’m jelly bro
their greatest mistake was not using a picture of Kristen Stewart with her mouth hanging open… really I’m shocked that they found one without it…
KS – running the gamut of emotions from A to B.
I think it’s from a to a…
Well.. I really like that harry potter girl, she’s cute and nice and stuf while the emo girl looks too much emo..
BUT! – the emo girl still has her hair!
The harry potter girl has no hair right now and that makes her look like my younger brother with boobs!!
Which is pretty f*cked up!!
Dude. Beautiful girls have been wearing short hair since the beginning of time and getting away with it. If you’re sincerely implying that Audrey Hepburn with short hair looked like a boy then there is something WRONG with you.
are you hitting on me
?
This was amusing
But Watson’s confident looks like happy, her hysterical looks mildly amused, her mischievous looks scared, her shocked looks contemplative, her her shy looks happy, her depressed looks confused, her shocked looks annoyed, her frustrated looks melancholy, her hopeful looks smug, and her angry looks terrified…… so that was a bit confusing.
Well, not everybody makes the same face for the same emotion ^^
ok roflrazzi, we got it about twenty thousand posts ago that you favour watson over steward. just let it go.
Bella’s face is always serious face.
If Emma Watson is a good actress I never saw it in Harry Potter. Maybe she gets a little better as the movies go on though. She has stopped the incessant blinking at least. Almost to a robotic lack of blinking…
Also Hermione and Bella both have basically the same annoying, confused look on their face through all of the movies. (I give you that Kristen seems to have that look all the time outside the movies too, not only when she’s desperately trying to act.)
I tried to post this once with links to show what I mean, but that seems to have disappeared, hopefully it won’t this time.
Okay, Imma just say, this was funny. Kristen almost never cracks much of a smile or shows ANY emotion.
But I think that she is a beautiful and talented actress for the movies she’s starred in so far. Emma Watson, too. They’re both amazing actresses and role models.
I hate when people hate on stars because of what movies they were in. I mean, I hate lots of movies, but I still love the people in them…people, try not to hate so much.
THE LOVE IS VANISHING Dx
I agree with you on the part about people hating stars for their roles, but not about Kristen Stewart being “beautiful” or “talented.” It’s just my opinion, but she’s not all that pretty. Emma Watson is way prettier.
The love isn’t vanishing, it’s that we can’t find it as easily as we used to.
You know, if you look at the right side very, very carefully, you can see minute differences between every expression.
Closer…
Clooooser….
Might have to go crosseyed for this one.
I get it, but don’t really want to…
She’s bad because she was in Twilight? You guys are just… You know what? Forget it… You don’t even deserve being that good
It’s not that she was in Twilight. It’s her ability to act in general. Have you seen any of the other movies she’s played in? Such as “Panic Room,” “Zathura,” “Catch That Kid,” or even “The Messengers?” Same dry performance in those movies, as well.
The hopeful of Emma Watson doesn’t look very hopeful
What’s really creepy is Kristens face doesn’t move as I scroll down the page…
Wouldn’t it be something if Kristen and Keanu had kids? At least they’d be quiet on an airplane. Then again, with all that flatness of affect, you could probably just put them in a FedEx envelope and ship them wherever they needed to go.
I’ve only seen Stewart in ONE other movie and that was the Lifetime movie for the book “Speak” playing an angsty teenager.
She has the acting talent and emotional display of a stump
Should have at least had a few of them where she’s biting her lip. I mean, she does have *some* dramatic range.
I wouldn’t blame Catherine Hardwicke for Kristens lack of acting ability. Yes, the director is supposed to bring out the best in the cast, but when your working with stone that’s kinda hard. The woman did direct Interview with the Vampire which was a spledid movie, and I’ve also seen Kristen in other movies and she looks just as much like a stoner that is spaced out as she does in all her other movies!
Yet she’s still in movies and making tons of money.
Now can we PLEASE for the love of god, STOP running this joke into the ground?? Your opinion is clearly noted.
But…but…it’s so much fun!!!
doesn’t matter as long as they’re both hot that’s all that matters
Has anyone actually seen “The Runaways”? I haven’t (yet, but I’m tempted; read on) but I did see a PR still where Kristen was talking to Joan Jett (the real one) and the resemblance was scary good.
It is fair to judge someone by the movies they were in though – if they had known the story was crap, then why would they audition for it?
A lot of us aren’t even judging them by the movies they were in, though. I’ve seen some of the other movies Kristen Stewart has been in, and she really isn’t a good actress. She delivers a dry, emotionless performance in most, if not all, of them.
all she can do is put her hair behind her ear, mutter words and softly reject boys.
Here are just a few differences between Emma Watson and Kristen Stewart: 1. Emma Watson is gorgeous. But with Kristen Stewart, it looks like some mad scientist was trying to make something ugly, but messed up and made something uglier than they meant. 2. Emma Watson is probably one of the best actresses I have ever seen. Kristen Stewart is most definitely one of the worst. 3. Emma Watson acts in the movie version of one of the best book series ever. Kristen Stewart acts in the worst.
I like you