Lol Celebs and Funny Celebrity Pictures with Captions!

 

« Previous | Next »


A Comparison Of Emotion

A Comparison Of Emotion

Via izismile

Submitted by: Unknown

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» See all 62 comments

  1. Liekefriet says:

    Why do you have to insult Kristen? She’s just shy,,, jeez, since when is that a crime?

    • Gerudo says:

      it’s not because she’s shy it’s because she can’t act…

      i mean, really, there’s 18 pictures of her and they all look the same!

    • belzebub says:

      you know.. she’s shy => she’s asking for it => she’s a whore => problem solved

    • forge says:

      Y’know how the trailers for movies always show the most dramatic and romantic parts of the film all clipped together into 30 seconds of amazing action? Well, with her movies, you can’t tell which is what. You could literally have had Nancyboy Pattinson shooting all their scenes with a woman carved from pine wood, and no one would have been able to tell the difference.

    • Jena says:

      LEAVE. KRISTEN. ALONEEEE *sobs*

      Please. Since when is not being able to act synonymous with being shy?

    • Emily says:

      At least one thing’s for sure.

      They’re both better than Miley Cyrus. :D

    • AshAshThompson says:

      Shy my ass.

    • Emma says:

      It’s a crime when you’re a huge movie star. She’s a performer! She’s not allowed to be shy! and if she is then she should get out of the business.

  2. BYRONIUS says:

    she IS horrribill!!!!!

  3. Ru says:

    I mean, Emma Watson is no Meryl Streep, but compared to Kristen Stewart…

  4. lolwut says:

    Can we please stop this obsession with Emma Watson? I can guarantee that if she was in Twilight and Kristen was in Harry Potter, the roles would be switched.

    • JD says:

      Doubt it. A lot.

    • Reallyy says:

      your kidding right?

    • Gaara says:

      Seriously doubt it.

    • katie says:

      Um and I can guarantee that you are wrong. Have you seen anything that Kristen Stewart did before Twilight? Because she’s the same person in every single movie. She has no personality off screen either. Being shy is not an excuse for having attitude.

      • forge says:

        ^^^ That. You can see pictures of her at book signings and other public appearances and she has the same non-expression on her face as she does in the movies whether she’s in the throes of passion or about to be eaten by zombie werewolves or whatever the hell are in those movies. In fact at a lot of the appearances she looks like she’s thinking “Jesus Christ I really do not want to be here, how much longer is this going to last until I can get AWAY from these PEOPLE.” No telling what she does when she finally gets to do what she wants to do, probably smoke pot and listen to Justin Bieber, since I seriously doubt she has any taste for culture.

    • RoflCopter says:

      i actually have to agree, in the books bella is just a moaning whore. She’s playing the part really well, it’s just the character’s s**t.

      Emma Watson isn’t as good as everyone makes out. :)

  5. Laaaaaa says:

    Emma Watson somehow reminds me of Tina Fey in a couple of those pictures…

  6. amy says:

    damn haters. it’s so stupid to be mean to people. Mean people are either jealous or have low self-esteem.

  7. moop says:

    their greatest mistake was not using a picture of Kristen Stewart with her mouth hanging open… really I’m shocked that they found one without it…

  8. Flora says:

    KS – running the gamut of emotions from A to B.

  9. belzebub says:

    Well.. I really like that harry potter girl, she’s cute and nice and stuf while the emo girl looks too much emo..

    BUT! – the emo girl still has her hair!
    The harry potter girl has no hair right now and that makes her look like my younger brother with boobs!!

    Which is pretty f*cked up!!

    • forge says:

      Dude. Beautiful girls have been wearing short hair since the beginning of time and getting away with it. If you’re sincerely implying that Audrey Hepburn with short hair looked like a boy then there is something WRONG with you.

  10. Bri says:

    This was amusing :) But Watson’s confident looks like happy, her hysterical looks mildly amused, her mischievous looks scared, her shocked looks contemplative, her her shy looks happy, her depressed looks confused, her shocked looks annoyed, her frustrated looks melancholy, her hopeful looks smug, and her angry looks terrified…… so that was a bit confusing.

  11. carnifex says:

    ok roflrazzi, we got it about twenty thousand posts ago that you favour watson over steward. just let it go.

  12. Rabidz says:

    Bella’s face is always serious face.

  13. Kejsi says:

    If Emma Watson is a good actress I never saw it in Harry Potter. Maybe she gets a little better as the movies go on though. She has stopped the incessant blinking at least. Almost to a robotic lack of blinking…

    Also Hermione and Bella both have basically the same annoying, confused look on their face through all of the movies. (I give you that Kristen seems to have that look all the time outside the movies too, not only when she’s desperately trying to act.)

    I tried to post this once with links to show what I mean, but that seems to have disappeared, hopefully it won’t this time.

  14. h8rs can die says:

    Okay, Imma just say, this was funny. Kristen almost never cracks much of a smile or shows ANY emotion.

    But I think that she is a beautiful and talented actress for the movies she’s starred in so far. Emma Watson, too. They’re both amazing actresses and role models.

    I hate when people hate on stars because of what movies they were in. I mean, I hate lots of movies, but I still love the people in them…people, try not to hate so much.

    THE LOVE IS VANISHING Dx

    • Caitlin says:

      I agree with you on the part about people hating stars for their roles, but not about Kristen Stewart being “beautiful” or “talented.” It’s just my opinion, but she’s not all that pretty. Emma Watson is way prettier.

      The love isn’t vanishing, it’s that we can’t find it as easily as we used to.

  15. MoonScar says:

    You know, if you look at the right side very, very carefully, you can see minute differences between every expression.

    Closer…

    Clooooser….

    Might have to go crosseyed for this one.

  16. TheSolx says:

    I get it, but don’t really want to…
    She’s bad because she was in Twilight? You guys are just… You know what? Forget it… You don’t even deserve being that good

    • Lilith says:

      It’s not that she was in Twilight. It’s her ability to act in general. Have you seen any of the other movies she’s played in? Such as “Panic Room,” “Zathura,” “Catch That Kid,” or even “The Messengers?” Same dry performance in those movies, as well.

  17. Lordi says:

    The hopeful of Emma Watson doesn’t look very hopeful

  18. Trogdoor says:

    What’s really creepy is Kristens face doesn’t move as I scroll down the page…

  19. widogmom says:

    Wouldn’t it be something if Kristen and Keanu had kids? At least they’d be quiet on an airplane. Then again, with all that flatness of affect, you could probably just put them in a FedEx envelope and ship them wherever they needed to go.

  20. Shuri says:

    I’ve only seen Stewart in ONE other movie and that was the Lifetime movie for the book “Speak” playing an angsty teenager.

    She has the acting talent and emotional display of a stump

  21. J says:

    Should have at least had a few of them where she’s biting her lip. I mean, she does have *some* dramatic range.

  22. VentureTwins says:

    I wouldn’t blame Catherine Hardwicke for Kristens lack of acting ability. Yes, the director is supposed to bring out the best in the cast, but when your working with stone that’s kinda hard. The woman did direct Interview with the Vampire which was a spledid movie, and I’ve also seen Kristen in other movies and she looks just as much like a stoner that is spaced out as she does in all her other movies!

  23. llamasweaters says:

    Yet she’s still in movies and making tons of money.

    Now can we PLEASE for the love of god, STOP running this joke into the ground?? Your opinion is clearly noted.

  24. ??????? says:

    doesn’t matter as long as they’re both hot that’s all that matters

  25. Paws4thot says:

    Has anyone actually seen “The Runaways”? I haven’t (yet, but I’m tempted; read on) but I did see a PR still where Kristen was talking to Joan Jett (the real one) and the resemblance was scary good.

  26. Rabbitfish says:

    It is fair to judge someone by the movies they were in though – if they had known the story was crap, then why would they audition for it?

    • Amelia says:

      A lot of us aren’t even judging them by the movies they were in, though. I’ve seen some of the other movies Kristen Stewart has been in, and she really isn’t a good actress. She delivers a dry, emotionless performance in most, if not all, of them.

  27. Toehat says:

    all she can do is put her hair behind her ear, mutter words and softly reject boys.

  28. noneofyourbusiness says:

    Here are just a few differences between Emma Watson and Kristen Stewart: 1. Emma Watson is gorgeous. But with Kristen Stewart, it looks like some mad scientist was trying to make something ugly, but messed up and made something uglier than they meant. 2. Emma Watson is probably one of the best actresses I have ever seen. Kristen Stewart is most definitely one of the worst. 3. Emma Watson acts in the movie version of one of the best book series ever. Kristen Stewart acts in the worst.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up